Dipping the toe in the water....
Jan. 8th, 2011 11:01 pmI made a comm.
Yes. I did.
It's called
commonplacebook and I am still floundering unnecessarily about it. I mean, I want it to be a convenient place to drop links to anything to do with Sherlock Holmes, in any incarnation, but ... well.. there are a lot of comms out there. Thing is, I think of it like Holmes's commonplace books (think paper scrapbooks!), where a lot of things would accrue and then he'd go through a fit of indexing them. In my case it would mean a fit of tagging.
But what to put there? Fics get lost, and having the old URL might be something to use at the Wayback machine, archives change URLS, authors change archives. A way to note those changes isn't bad. And then there's the deadtree world of Holmes. I mean, books get published or self published and a review would be helpful... I mean, if I wrote a review for "Sherlock Holmes and the Zombie Problem" would anyone read it? If you find a really excellent source on Victorian medicine on the net, do you tell anyone? There don't seem to be any venues for that sort of thing. And it might be nice to have a list of comms, or pointers to the strange and marvelous. So, a comm it is, and not just me maundering, because other people find shiny things too.
Then there's the problem of whether or not to allow anon comments. And whether to moderate posts and all. At the moment I'm pretty cautious about it, because I keep seeing spam in comms that aren't.
Anyway, it's there. And if you want to play, come and play. And I'll start going through my library and writing reviews so there'll be some content for you to look at. Or something.
Yes. I did.
It's called
But what to put there? Fics get lost, and having the old URL might be something to use at the Wayback machine, archives change URLS, authors change archives. A way to note those changes isn't bad. And then there's the deadtree world of Holmes. I mean, books get published or self published and a review would be helpful... I mean, if I wrote a review for "Sherlock Holmes and the Zombie Problem" would anyone read it? If you find a really excellent source on Victorian medicine on the net, do you tell anyone? There don't seem to be any venues for that sort of thing. And it might be nice to have a list of comms, or pointers to the strange and marvelous. So, a comm it is, and not just me maundering, because other people find shiny things too.
Then there's the problem of whether or not to allow anon comments. And whether to moderate posts and all. At the moment I'm pretty cautious about it, because I keep seeing spam in comms that aren't.
Anyway, it's there. And if you want to play, come and play. And I'll start going through my library and writing reviews so there'll be some content for you to look at. Or something.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-09 08:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-09 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-09 08:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-10 05:11 am (UTC)Is it possible to index, organize, put in a table of contents, etc? Or is it essentially a digital version of a physical scrapbook, to be wandered through in the order posted?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-10 12:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-15 05:20 pm (UTC)Years ago I wanted to create an online Sherlockian library to archive all forms of media (radio and TV to books and fanfic) but was never brave or ambitious enough to do it.
I think I would actually read a review on "SH and the Zombie Problem" if only to hear how bad it was. (I watch Nostalgia Critic for that purpose -- his review of "A Troll in Central Park" always has me cracking up.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-01-16 01:59 am (UTC)Please do join. Right now everyone is shy about posting. Yes, it's mediated posting, but that's only to keep down unsolicited advertisements in Russian.