Page Summary
rubynye.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elwenlj.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frodobaggins252.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elendiari22.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lily-the-hobbit.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mariole.livejournal.com - (no subject)
unhobbityhobbit.livejournal.com - (no subject)
claudia603.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shirebound - (no subject)
surgicalsteel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lame-pegasus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
danachan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fictualities.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Librarian's Dream by
- Theme: Antares by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:01 am (UTC)And I think your writing is surely not elementary school level! Goodness!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:08 am (UTC)On the other hand, it means it's infinitely accessable to anyone who might wish to read it ;)
**hugging erudite hobbit**
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:19 am (UTC)Mine's genius. :p
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:28 am (UTC)*grin*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 10:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:20 am (UTC)Normally my professional writing comes in at college level, which is bad. My audience should target no higher than 10th grade.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 05:05 pm (UTC)His final score was 4th grade. I hope you don't write like this. We were falling down laughing. If you wrote like that, we would be falling down crying. Really-- no one can write like this. So you may revert to your sophisticated prosage at any time. Cheers!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:21 am (UTC)Anyway, it can't be right because that's the same as what I got and you're far better at composing complex and elegant sentences than I.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:54 am (UTC)That's what I got, too. :O
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 05:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 02:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 05:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 11:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:23 pm (UTC)I delight in the prolix profundities of a magniloquent muse! I prefer to be querulous instead of cranky, verbose instead of wordy, rambunctious instead of hyper!
You use five dollar words over nickel terminology for the same reason that you buy twenty dollar steaks instead of dollarmenu cheeseburgers, or that people walk around wearing thirty dollar t-shirts. Because you can afford the more expensive (or expansive) vocabulary.
If you've got it, flaunt it!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:46 pm (UTC)I delight in the prolix profundities of a magniloquent muse!
-- doesn't sound like you. You sound like a good writer, not like a thirteen- year-old who just discovered her thesaurus. You use five-dollar words on occasion, but only when they're appropriate both to your meaning and to your audience. And I very much doubt whether a simple blog-based algorithm -- one that takes about a second to run and that's being used to advertise cash advance loans -- is sophisticated enough to test for grace, beauty, accuracy, or rhetorical efficacy.
To put it another way, people who can afford to buy twenty-dollar steaks don't eat them for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. They eat them when they feel like steak.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-17 01:33 am (UTC)The meme is clearly inadequate. The algorithm doesn't scan down very far, obviously, since my bathtub entry (which wasn't behind a lj-cut) came up as high-school, and you'd think that a test of this sort would opt for the highest level of difficulty.
I think, it must be confessed, that my back gets up when people talk about using nickel words as if it were always preferable to using the "expensive" stuff. Because I work with children, I am painfully aware of how repeated exposures to a word are necessary for it to become a part of a functional vocabulary. Because I work with children who don't like to read "hard books", as well as children who do, I can see the difference that reading level makes on the readers over time.
And of course, I have my own experience as a young teenager. I read Sherlock Holmes gleefully, without encouragement from any adult I knew, which means I did it without a dictionary at my elbow. In A Study in Scarlet, Watson first reads one of Holmes' opinions on detection and cries "Poppycock!" throwing his egg spoon down with alacrity. Now, I didn't know what an egg spoon was, but I could guess, and I didn't know what alacrity was either, but I knew what "poppycock" was, so I guessed that "alacrity" meant something like "disgust" and kept reading.
Now I may have hit "alacrity" a few more times, but it wasn't until I was reading "Amok Time" in the James Blish short story adaptations of the original Trek shows that I questioned my guess. After the battle, when Spock wants to go down to Sick Bay and see how his father is doing, Kirk gives him permission and he leaves with something very much like alacrity.
That's when I hit the dictionary. Three years at least after the first time I saw the word. But what if James Blish had decided to use nickel words? He could have just written "cheerful briskness". It would have meant the same thing. And I could still be putzing along with a completely upside-down idea of what "alacrity" means.
Use words. Use lots of words. Use big words! Use unusual words!! Do your readers a favor!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-06 07:15 pm (UTC)The site reckoned that my blog is high school reading level - which I assume is the school age range 11 to 18?