More Adventures in Cooking.
Oct. 13th, 2007 01:17 pmDecided to try baking bacon, ala the cookingforengineers method of a very low (200F) slow oven, and couldn't see having the oven on for just that, so I threw in some unpeeled corn on the cob, potatoes, and an apple. All just about noon. Just had one of the ears of corn and it was very nice. Going to give it another fifteen and try a second one, because it could have been a bit hotter, but the taste was marvelous, and unlike corn in the microwave, I didn't burn myself trying to de-husk or de-string the cob. The potatoes are still hard and the apple is not quite soft enough yet...
But the corn, very nice after an hour and fifteen.
ETA: Corn even nicer after 2 and half hours, if you like it more soft than crunchy. I can see the low slow oven technique being useful in a big family gathering when you want to keep a lot of things warming in the oven and still have a few corners to spare.
But the corn, very nice after an hour and fifteen.
ETA: Corn even nicer after 2 and half hours, if you like it more soft than crunchy. I can see the low slow oven technique being useful in a big family gathering when you want to keep a lot of things warming in the oven and still have a few corners to spare.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 06:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 07:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 07:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 07:58 pm (UTC)I'll have to try it without a wrapper next time I try it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 08:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 08:13 pm (UTC)I like keeping it in the husk, and these days I don't bother to cut off the stem either. Husk and stem together make a nice handle for eating.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 08:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 10:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-14 12:40 am (UTC)That's a great tip.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-18 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 06:50 pm (UTC)I love it when experiments work!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 08:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 10:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 08:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-13 10:41 pm (UTC)I'd say that if I were doing some slow roasting, I'd be happy to have a pan of bacon on the bottom rack like this again. The bacon did come out nice and flat, which is really nice for sandwiches, and I must've liked it, because there wasn't any left to save for tomorrow!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-14 02:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-14 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-23 06:17 pm (UTC)And no spattering!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-15 08:37 pm (UTC)Does it save money to bake that long and low like driving 55? My Mom despised it when a caregiver we had for my grandmother baked the bacon because it made such a mess in the oven. Is added taste the benefit for cooking that long?
LOL
You have stirred the scientist in me!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-15 09:12 pm (UTC)I wanted to cook something low and slow because the apartment was cold and I haven't turned the heat on yet this year, I had some bacon, and I'd read the thing at cookingforengineers a while back and was intrigued. And yes, it did affect the flavor, but I have no idea of whether or not it would save money. It does give me more faith in the idea of using some kind of solar cookery over the course of a day, though, because even with fairly low temps I got good results.
http://www.cookingforengineers.com/
http://www.cookingforengineers.com/article/3/Bacon-Part-I
http://www.cookingforengineers.com/article/110/Bacon-Part-II
Slow baking is the last link.