Page Summary
cara-chapel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lilybaggins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frodobaggins252.livejournal.com - (no subject)
semyaza.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fictualities.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kimbys-place.livejournal.com - (no subject)
slipperieslope.livejournal.com - (no subject)
belleferret.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Librarian's Dream by
- Theme: Antares by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 05:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 06:15 am (UTC)Two people are too big to fit into a cahoot. A cahoot is a one-passenger vehicle, so to speak, although there's never just one driver or passenger.
Therefore, multiple cahoots must be brought forth. *nods*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 06:31 am (UTC)and now, from Merriam Webster Online:
cahoot
One entry found for cahoot.
Main Entry: ca·hoot
Pronunciation: k&-'hüt
Function: noun
Etymology: perhaps from French cahute cabin, hut
: PARTNERSHIP, LEAGUE -- usually used in plural they're in cahoots
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 07:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 12:59 pm (UTC)Sem's also right -- according to the OED it was originally singular and switched to plural late in the nineteenth century. If I had to hazard a guess as to why, I'd say because to native English speakers "in cahoot" sounds unnatural. Normally in American English, a singular common noun takes an article after a preposition (we say "in a box" or "in a field," even though we omit the article with a proper noun like "in New York.") So it seems likely that at come point the idiom was unconsciously overcorrected to "in cahoots" so it would sound more like the way we treat other common nouns ("in boxes" as opposed to "in a box").
Just a theory; the OED has nothing to say about why it happened, but unconscious overcorrection like that happens a lot to grammatically anomalous idioms.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 01:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 02:50 pm (UTC)Oh, right, cahoots. I don't know! ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 06:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-10 11:57 pm (UTC)